APEX RACEWIRE Newsroom
FIA International Court of Appeal to review contentious Monaco GP penalty
McLaren and Red Bull will challenge the decision to reinstate Pierre Gasly’s podium finish following an administrative error regarding pit-lane speed limits.
By Sanne Vermeer - 2026-08-19T10:15:57.000Z - 2 min read
The ongoing dispute over the final classification of the 2026 Monaco Grand Prix is heading to the FIA’s International Court of Appeal. The governing body has confirmed that a closed-door hearing will take place on Tuesday, August 25, at its headquarters in Paris, following the upcoming Dutch Grand Prix weekend at Zandvoort.
At the heart of the matter is the decision to overturn a pit-lane speeding penalty initially handed to Alpine driver Pierre Gasly. Following the race, the FIA admitted that the speed limit during the event had been miscalculated. Alpine subsequently won a right of appeal, which saw Gasly’s penalty removed and his standing in the race improved from seventh to third place.
This retroactive change triggered a shuffle in the final standings, most notably stripping Red Bull’s Isack Hadjar of his maiden podium finish. Hadjar, who had been promoted to third following Gasly’s initial punishment, was relegated back to fourth, while Oscar Piastri was also impacted by the fallout. The disparity arises because other drivers who incurred similar penalties during the race had already served their drive-throughs or time additions, whereas the FIA’s retroactive correction applied only to Gasly.
McLaren and Red Bull have formally lodged protests against the reversal, arguing that the decision undermines the integrity of the sport. In a statement, McLaren emphasized that teams operated under the understanding that the regulations and procedures applied at the time were final. They warned that removing penalties after the fact risks creating a landscape where competitors are unfairly disadvantaged for adhering to the rules as enforced during the race.
The precedent set by the FIA’s U-turn has drawn criticism from within the paddock. Oscar Piastri recently voiced concerns that the drawn-out process leaves the official race results in limbo, noting that such cycles of appeal make it difficult to maintain certainty in the standings long after the chequered flag. The complexity of the situation is further highlighted by the fact that Mercedes previously considered their own appeal after George Russell was dropped to 12th due to a procedural error while serving a penalty, though they ultimately chose to withdraw.
While the upcoming hearing will provide clarity on the classification of the Monaco event, the case remains a significant point of contention regarding the consistency of the FIA’s sporting regulations. Whether the court will uphold the original results or find grounds to restore the penalties remains to be determined, but the outcome will likely have lasting implications for how the governing body handles administrative errors during race weekends.